







Don, "Honey, calm down. It is okay to be skeptical. We can always asked questions."
Joel, "Anny, it is really okay if your hearing and getting more upset. That might be a good thing. All I ask is that you don't ignore what you find in anger. Don't just say to your self, oh that is just so much crap, I don't care what the scriptures say, what is being shown, or anything, I know it is wrong. It is crap. Don't say those things to yourself. Check it out, prove that these things are right. Not that there wrong. You can prove they are wrong to yourself by just ignoring it."
Anny, "Okay, I will do that. I just want to listen right now. I'll let Dan and Sir Tommy discuss this with you for now."
Tommy, "You know something, this is going along the lines that I, myself can understand. Because isn't it true that we read in I Corinthians 15:26 that "The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death". Death is an enemy . It is not a friend.
Joel, "Very good! You should be asking yourself, If we go to God immediately upon our death, how can Paul refer to death as an enemy? And knowing this then your next question should be, how was death conquered?"
Tommy, " I think I can answer that. We can look at I Corinthians 15:17-20, and it will give us the answer to that. Here it is. Let me read it but not verbatim, "And if Christ be not raised, your faith is in vain; ....Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished .... "
Joel, " I wonder if you really noticed the word perished here Tommy? .But now is Christ risen from the dead". And in verse 22, "For as in Adam, all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive". Note the contrast between the unthinkable, that Christ had not risen and the fact that He had risen. Because Christ had risen, those that are His shall also rise. ... be made alive. Christ's resurrection is that which conquers death. And because He was raised, those in Christ shall also be raised. The Greek word translated "raised' in this passage is "egiro" and the Greek word for "resurrection" is "anastasis".
Tommy, "Is being raised a different event than resurrection?"
Joel, "Let us
examine a few of the scriptures which use these two Greek words.
The word "Egiro" is found 137 times in the New testament. It is used of
resurrection
74 times. We read in Matthew 16:21, "From that time forth began Jesus
to shew
unto His disciples how that He must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many
things
of the elders and chief priests and scribes and be killed, and be
raised,egiro,
again the third day". "Egiro" then refers to the time when Christ, as
the first
fruits, was raised from the dead.
Looking at I Corinthians 15:13, "But if there be no resurrection,
anastasis,
of the dead, then is Christ not risen, egiro". Paul's point in this
passage
is to assure his readers that, false teachings aside, there is indeed a
resurrection
of the dead. If there were no resurrection of the dead then Christ
would still
be in the grave. But, Christ was raised and that proves that there is a
resurrection.With
that in mind, let us re-examine I Corinthians 5:13. "But if there be no
resurrection,
anastasis, of the dead, then is Christ not risen, egiro". This
verse makes
it clear that "anastasis" and "egiro" refer to the exact same event,
resurrection.
Tommy, " Yes. If man is alive after death apart from
resurrection,
how is Christ's resurrection the conquering of the enemy, death? And,
even more
to the point, why is resurrection even necessary, if we are alive
anyway before
resurrection?"
Joel, " that
is right. The unsaved man is no longer alive after death. And because
the same
fate befalls the saved as the unsaved at death, the saved also are no
longer
alive. But because the saved will be resurrected, it is only the saved
who do
not perish, because only the saved are resurrected unto resurrection
life.
All this is being said with the understanding that the view that the
saved go
to heaven immediately upon death is one that has been taught for many,
many
years. It obviously didn't come out of nowhere. In order to study this
subject
as thoroughly as possible we should consider the scriptures that seem
to teach
the widely held view.
So what about Philippians 1:23, it says here:
For I am in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart and to be
with Christ;
which is far better.
There is no doubt that taken apart from the teaching of God's holy Word
concerning
what happens at death, this verse does certainly seem to suggest that
when a
believer dies he goes to be with Christ. But, we can not dismiss the
teachings
of scriptures as to what death is, as to the fact that the body goes
back to
dust and the spirit has no life or personality in itself. How then, are
we to
understand this verse?
What did Job tell us, through the Holy Spirit, about death.
Job 14:10, "But man dies and is laid low; he breathes his last and is
no more".
Job 34:14 "If He set His heart upon man, if He gather unto Himself his
spirit
and his breath; All flesh shall perish together, and man shall
turn
again unto dust ".
When man dies and "is no more", he doesn't exist. When the breath of
life is
separated from the body, man does not exist. So when Paul writes of
departing
to be with Christ, he was most naturally not counting the time that he
will
not exist, the years of his burial. There is No time existent in death.
Tommy, "Okay then, I am thinking of another one that
we
should look at. What about 2 Corinthians 5:8? It says here that:
We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body,
and
to be present with the Lord.
Joel, "A very
good question. Many times this verse is misquoted as this: "to be
absent
from the body is to be present with the Lord". It is misquoted because
that
is the meaning that many have given this verse. If it were true that to
be absent
from the body is to be present with the Lord, how could we possibly
consider
death an enemy? But that is how death is described in scriptures, as an
enemy.
Why would we need to be resurrected? And what part of us is with the
Lord? That
is to say, the soul is not part of us, the spirit is nothing more than
the breath
of life, for it has no life or personality in itself. And the body
returns to
dust. How then shall we understand this verse?
Dan, "Hm, this comes to mind. I believe that in order
to be consistent in our understanding of death we must see in this
verse the
same thing we see in Philippians 1:23 then. That Paul is not counting
the time
that he is dead because he does not exist then. So, he knew that the
first thing
that he will know when he is resurrected, when he is made alive again,
is that
he is present with the Lord. Naturally, he is willing to be absent from
the
body, when that is what he has to look forward to. Is that correct.
Joel, "Oh Yes.
That is it Dan. Congratulations. That was wonderful."
Tommy. "Okay, what about Luke 20:38. It says
here:
"For He is not a God of the dead, but of the living: for all live unto
Him."
Doesn't this verse mean that because God is the God of the living, all
are alive?
Joel, "If that
were true, how then are we to understand Romans 14:9 because it says,
"For to
this end Christ died, and rose, and revived, that He might be Lord both
of the dead and living?" Let us examine the context of Luke
20:38.
Verse 27 of Luke 20 gives us the reason for this particular discourse
of our
Lord's. "Then came to Him certain of the Sadducees, which deny that
there is
any resurrection...". It is clear that the verse under consideration
comes in
the context of Christ's response to the implied question as to whether
there
is indeed a resurrection of the dead. Verse 37 is part of this same
discourse.
"Now, that the dead are raised, even Moses shewed at the bush, when he
calleth
the Lord the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac and the God of
Jacob". The
point of this verse is that Moses knew that Abraham and Isaac and Jacob
would
live. Does that mean that they were not dead? The answer is simply
"no". There
is no scriptural evidence that they are alive, and if they were not
dead, why
would they need to be resurrected from the dead? God is spirit and is
therefore
not confined to the limits of time, He looks upon those who
will live
in resurrection life as already alive. In other words, there
is a
gap in time for we who live in time, but there is no gap for God, who
does not
live in time.
Tommy , " I think I understand. I Corinthians 15:23-25
is an excellent example of a gap that is not mentioned, because God is
not confined
to time. It says 23)"But every man in his own order: Christ the first
fruits;
afterward they that are Christ's at His coming. 24) Then cometh the end
when
He shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when He
shall
have put down all rule and all authority and power.25) For He must
reign, till
He hath put all enemies under His feet". Verse 23 speaks of the second
coming
of Christ. Verse 24 reads, "then cometh the end". But the end is 1,000
years
after His coming.
Dan, "How do we know that?
Tommy, "We know
that because Christ will not deliver the kingdom to the Father until He
has
"put down all rule and all power and all authority". And it is
reminded
to us that at the end of the 1,000 year reign of Christ the nations
will rebel.
This is shown in Revelation 20:7-9. We cannot say that all rule power
and authority
are put down when there is a rebellion of the nations pending. Also,
death is
not destroyed until after the millennial reign, as it is said in
Revelation
20:14. It should be clear to all of us that there is a gap of 1,000
years between
I Corinthians 15:23 and 15:24. Meaning, we read in verse 23 of the
coming of
Christ. Then the next phrase is "then cometh the end". But there is a
1,000
year gap between the coming of Christ and the end. This is not a
mistake. There
is no error on Paul's part. We must bear in mind that God is spirit and
does
not live in time and space.
Joel, "Thank you Tommy, that is correct. Back to what
I was saying. Paul writes in Romans 14:9 that God is the Lord " both
of the dead and living ". But Christ in Luke 20:38 was
telling the
Sadducees that Moses understood that there would be a resurrection when
He "called
the Lord the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac and the God of
Jacob". Resurrection
was the theme in Luke 20, we can not dismiss that theme if we want a
true understanding
of verse 38.
Dan, "I have found a passage that makes this
difficult.
John 6:47 says, Verily, verily, I say unto you, 'He that believeth on
Me hath
everlasting life. Does not this verse mean that there is life in man
and he
will never die?
Joel, "I don't like to answer question with another question. But I have to ask myself, How then would we explain what death is? If it is not death but life, then why is it an enemy? If we are alive when we die, why would we need to be resurrected? The fact is there is no scriptural answers for the questions you have asked because man is not alive when he dies, for he is dead. There is no time existent in death.
Dan, "How then
are we to understand the meaning of this verse?"
Joel, "Great question Dan. There are two things to
consider
in trying to answer that question. The first is, as has been said
above, that
God is not limited by, nor does He live in, time. When there is no
time, everything
happens in the present. So God can speak of man having everlasting life
at the
moment he accepts Christ as his Savior because for God, everything is
in the
present.
The second thing to consider is that every believer has the guarantee
of resurrection
life. "In Whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth,
the gospel
of your salvation: in Whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed
with
that holy spirit of promise, which is the earnest of our inheritance
until the
redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of His glory",
Ephesians
1:13-14. If the believer is guaranteed redemption, obviously we can
count on
that guarantee. That is to say in the vernacular, "it's as good as
done".
Dan, "Oh,, oh.. what about John 11:26 And whosoever
liveth
and believeth in Me shall never die.
Joel, "This verse my suggest to you that the believer
doesn't really die, but lives forever. But we read in the previous
verse, verse
25, "..... he that believeth in Me, though he were dead, yet
shall he
live ". That proves that even believers do die."
Dan, "Oh but does not this talk about spiritual death?"
Joel, "In context
that argument is unfounded. The context is not about spiritual death as
opposed
to real death. It is about believers who are dead, in verse 25, and
believers
who were then alive in verse 26. The point is that at the time our Lord
uttered
the words recorded in John 11:25-26, Israel was, correctly, looking
forward
to the millennium to begin in their life time. Had Israel accepted
their Messiah,
those believers alive at the time would not have died. John 6:58 is
another
passage that speaks of living forever. Again, We must understand that
verse
in its dispensational setting, otherwise it contradicts a great many
other scriptures
and their teaching as to the need for resurrection.
Anny, "I just noticed this passage. Matthew 17:1-3 And
after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James and John his brother, and
bringeth
them up into an high mountain apart, and was transfigured before them;
and His
face did shine as the sun and His raiment was white as the light. And
behold,
there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with Him.
Doesn't the fact that Moses and Elias were talking with our Lord prove
that
Moses and Elias had not been dead, but alive in heaven?
Joel, "Verse 9 gives us the answer to that question. "And as they came down from the mountain, Jesus charged them saying, 'Tell the vision to no man....". Peter, James and John did not see Moses and Elias, they were a vision .
Anny, " I have to say it. So? Why does that matter. Whether it was a vision or not?
Tommy, "Let me answer that. In Scripture, a vision is a revelation from God which is an appearance or exhibition of something supernaturally presented to the minds of the prophets, by which they were informed of future events. Such were the visions of Isaiah, of Amos, of Ezekiel, & Matthew."
Joel, "That is a very good definition Tommy. I look to
look into it a little deeper. This is what I have found in previous
studies
on the subject. And I have brought these notes so that I can share with
you.
And even had made copies so that you can take them with you. Yes, I
know, that
means that I understood the fact that this verse would be popping up
somewhere
while we were discussing this topic. But, even if it didn't, it is good
to be
prepared. So here you go. Read it at your leisure."
Anny, "Joel, could you read it out loud, I can't get my eyes to focus."
Joel, "Sure.
It says, The Greek word translated "vision" is "horama". The Greek word
is used
twelve times in the New Testament. As we study each occurrence we will
see how
the Holy Spirit had intended for us to understand this word. It is
always translated
"vision", except in Acts 7:31.
The first occurrence is Matthew 17:9 which I have already quoted
previously.
So I won't read that.
Acts 7:31, "And when Moses saw it,the burning bush in verse 30, he
wondered
at the sight...". The Greek word translated sight in this verse is the
"horama"
the same word translated "vision" in Matthew 17:9. The account of the
burning
bush is given in Exodus 3. Unfortunately, the Hebrew has "he saw" the
burning
bush, but that phrase was not included in the KJV. So it can be told to
you
the meaning of that Hebrew word translated "saw" at this point.
However, based
on the fact that the 11 other occurrences of the word "horama" is
translated
"vision", I would say that here too, Moses saw a vision of a burning
bush. Which
might be very surprising to you.
Acts 9:9-10, "And he, that being Paul, was three days without sight,
and neither
did eat nor drink. And there was a certain disciple at Damascus, named
Ananias:
and to him said the Lord in a vision....".
Acts 9:11-12, "And the Lord said unto him, that being Annias, 'Arise,
and go
unto the street which is called Straight, and inquire in the house of
Judas
for one called Saul, of Tarsus: for, behold, he prayeth, and hath seen
in a
vision a man named Ananias coming in, and putting his hand on him, that
he might receive his sight ". It couldn't be more clear that
"horama"
does not mean "to see with the eyes" because we are specifically told
that Paul
could not see when had this vision.
Acts 10:3, "He, that being Cornelius, saw in a vision, evidently about
the ninth
hour of the day, an angel of God coming in to him...."
Acts 10:17, "Now while Peter doubted in himself what this vision which
he had
seen should mean...."
Acts 10:19, "While Peter thought on the vision...."
Acts 11:5, "I was in the city of Joppa praying: and in a
trance
I saw a vision, a certain vessel descend as it had been a great sheet
let down
from heaven by four corners..." The last four occurrences of "horama"
refer
to Peter's vision. This verse tells us that he had been in a trance.
That tells
us that Peter did not see the actual sheet, but a vision.
Acts 12:8-9, "And the angel said unto him, Peter who was in prison,
'Gird thyself,
and bind on thy sandals.' And so he did, And he saith unto him, 'Cast
thy garment
about thee, and follow me.' And he went out, and followed him: and wist
not
that it was true which was done by the angel: but thought he saw a
vision".
Note the contrast in this passage between what Peter thought he was
actually
seeing, and seeing a vision.
Acts 16:9, "And a vision appeared to Paul in the night...".
Acts 16:10, "And after he had seen the vision, immediately we
endeavored to
go into Macedonia...".
Acts 18:9, "Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision...".
Because we are told quite specifically in Matthew 17:9 that what Peter,
James
and John had seen was a vision, we may conclude that Moses and Elijah
were not,
and are not alive, but that they were seen in a vision.
Tommy, " Now, I have to ask. What about the story of
the
rich man and Lazarus?
Joel, "Great question. Why don't you read it to us Tommy."
Tommy, "Okay, the story of the
rich man and Lazarus is found in Luke chapter 16. It says, 19:
There
was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and
fared
sumptuously every day: 20: And there was a certain beggar
named Lazarus,
which was laid at his gate, full of sores, 21: And desiring
to be
fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the
dogs
came and licked his sores. 22: And it came to pass, that
the beggar
died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man
also
died, and was buried; 23: And in hell he lift up his eyes,
being in
torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. 24:
And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send
Lazarus, that
he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am
tormented
in this flame. 25: But Abraham said, Son, remember that
thou in thy
lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things:
but now
he is comforted, and thou art tormented. 26: And beside all
this,
between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which
would pass
from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come
from
thence. 27: Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father,
that thou
wouldest send him to my father's house: 28: For I have five
brethren;
that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of
torment.
29: Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the
prophets; let
them hear them. 30: And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but
if one went
unto them from the dead, they will repent. 31: And
he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will
they be
persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Ain't that
life 9